Will SCOTUS allow religious chilling-effect claims without a final land-use decision?
Before 2028Politics
Will SCOTUS allow religious chilling-effect claims without a final land-use decision?
Before 2028Politics
Kalshi 活跃 1 个市场·50¢ Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of Daniel Grand in Grand v. City of University Heights·$0 总交易量·-- 流动性·-- OI
22mo·Aug 1, 2028
追踪你的预测市场持仓
连接你的 Kalshi 账户，追踪你的合约、盈亏和结算。
Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of Daniel Grand in Grand v. City of University Heights+0.0% 24h
Yes 50%
No 50%
$0 量
暂无图表数据
If the Supreme Court, in Grand v. City of University Heights, rules the land-use finality requirement does not displace a First Amendment chilling-effect claim based on credible government threats that deter religious exercise, worship, or assembly, then the market resolves to Yes.
追踪您在 Kalshi 上的投注——以及一切其他资产
从您的 Kalshi 头寸、盈亏和实时赔率开始，创建免费投资组合。然后添加加密钱包、交易所、DeFi 等——一切尽在一处。
Polymarket
Kalshi
50+ Chains
40+ Exchanges
DeFi
NFTs
16K+ Tokens
100% 免费· 只读· 加密保护