Will SCOTUS allow religious chilling-effect claims without a final land-use decision?
Before 2028Politics
Will SCOTUS allow religious chilling-effect claims without a final land-use decision?
Before 2028Politics
Kalshi Active 1 markets·50¢ Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of Daniel Grand in Grand v. City of University Heights·$0 Total Volume·-- Liquidity·-- OI
22mo·Aug 1, 2028
Track your prediction positions
Connect your Kalshi account to track your contracts, P&L, and settlements.
Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of Daniel Grand in Grand v. City of University Heights+0.0% 24h
Yes 50%
No 50%
$0 Vol
No chart data available
If the Supreme Court, in Grand v. City of University Heights, rules the land-use finality requirement does not displace a First Amendment chilling-effect claim based on credible government threats that deter religious exercise, worship, or assembly, then the market resolves to Yes.
Track Your Bets on Kalshi — and Everything Else
Create a free portfolio starting with your Kalshi positions, P&L & live odds. Then add crypto wallets, exchanges, DeFi & more — all in one place.
Polymarket
Kalshi
50+ Chains
40+ Exchanges
DeFi
NFTs
16K+ Tokens
100% free· Read-only· Encrypted